Inducement and activity analysis of antibacterial-related proteins/peptides in housefly larvae
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Third-instar larvae of housefly (Musca domestica) were treated with different inducing methods including pricking, pricking with bacteria, heat shock, and ultrasonication, and collected at different times. The antibacterial activity was measured with liquid phase assay, and the antibacterial-related proteins/peptides were confirmed with stepwise regression model. The results showed that the above four treatments all could induce antibacterial substances. Among these induced proteins, X 16 (22?kD) had activity against Micrococcus luteus and Escherichia coli, but X 2 (50?kD), X 12 (26?kD), X 22 (13?kD), X 24 (7?kD) only had activity against either M. luteus or E. coli, and X 7 (37?kD) had negative effect on antibacterial activity, which was deduced to be factors that stimulated cell to grow rapidly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it