MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354503817

Research on Strategy for Stochastic Blockage Recovery time in Canadian Travel Problem Based on Exponential Distribution

2011· article· en· W2354503817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ligang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueShuxue de shijian yu renshi · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential functionExponential distributionMathematical optimizationComputer scienceDistribution (mathematics)Point (geometry)Operations researchGamma distributionTime pointMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The online Canadian Traveler Problem(CTP) is considered for the case when the blockages occur one by one without any predictable information.From the online point of view,the waiting strategy and the greedy strategy are proposed.The competitive ratios of the two strategies are given based on the assumption that each blockage recovery time satisfies exponential distribution.The performance of these two strategies are analyzed and compared in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShuxue de shijian yu renshiSame topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207