Alexipharmic effect of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride on rape from phytotoxicity of imazethapyr
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulated experiment was carried out to investigate the alexipharmic effect and mechanism of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride( NA) on the imazethapyr residues in soil using potted rape as bioassay material. The rape seedling height,fresh weight,activity of glutathione-S-transferase( GST),amount of amino acids,and content of glutathione( GSH) were reduced with 25g ai /hm2imazethapyr. The damage was alleviated under seed dressing with 0. 5%( seed weight) NA. Compared tothe treatment of imazethapyr,rape seedling height and fresh weight were increased under NA + imazethapyr. The amount of amino acids,content of GSH,and activity of GSTs were induced by both NA and imazethapyr. Under NA + imazethapyr,16 amino acids( except proline) were increased,GSH was slightly accumulated,while GST activity was significantly stimulated. Results indicated that imazethapyr detoxification was resulted from high amount of amino acid and more active GSTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".