MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354717149

Research of Double-ring Agent Genetic Algorithm for Global Numerical Optimization

2008· article· en· W2354717149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Technology and Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Meta-optimizationGenetic algorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationPopulationAlgorithmGlobal optimizationConstruct (python library)Optimization algorithmOptimization problemMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the low optimization precision and long optimization time of classical agent genetic algorithm,double chain-like agents structure is proposed to construct a kind of multi-population agent co-genetic algorithm with chain-like agent structure(DCAGA).This algorithm adopted multi-population parallel searching mode,close chain-like agent structure,cycle chain-like agent structure,and has the characteristics of high optimization precision and short optimization time.For verifying this algorithm,some popular benchmark functions were used for test this algorithm and a kind of popular agent genetic algorithm(MAGA).The experimental results show that DCAGA has higher optimization precision and shorter optimization time than MAGA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it