Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mallik gas hydrate production test well was the first International Continental Scientific Drilling Program(ICDP) executed within Canada and leaded by Canada.The purposes of this program were to conduct short term but continuous gas hydrate production in several different ways and to assess the environmental implications of gas hydrate production activity under a multidisciplinary frame.The well location was chosen on the Beaufort Continental Margin,at the north most Mackenzie Delta,which is an area rich of oil and gas in Northwest Territories of Canada.Three holes with 40 m apart were drilled.The middle served as the production well,while the other two besides as the observation wells.Pressuredrawdown and thermal-stimulation were used on the middle hole during the production test.Before this program,based on the production modeling studies,we only known that by pressure-drawdown and thermal-stimulation,gas hydrate dissociation could be fast enough for the gas production,but the economic feasibility remain unknown.The Mallik test result for the first time proved the economic feasibility of gas hydrate production by means of either of pressure-drawdown or thermal-stimulation or the two methods combined.The result also shown that when combined the pressure-drawdown and thermal stimulation together we will get the highest gas production rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".