Laser-induced damage behaviors of Ta_2O_5/SiO_2 narrow-band interference filters under different laser output modes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The laser-induced damage threshold(LIDT) and damage morphology of Ta_2O_5/SiO_2 narrow-band interference filters under single-pulse laser and free-running laser were investigated. The weak absorptance and the standing-wave fields of the filters have also been measured and analyzed. It was shown that narrow-band interference filters had unique laser-induced damage behaviors. All the filters exhibited a pass-band center dependent LIDT and absorptance behavior: LIDT of the samples decreased, as the sample’s pass-band center was closer to laser wavelength 1 064nm; Absorptances of the samples increased as the sample’s pass-band center was closer to laser wavelength 1 064 nm. Under single-pulse laser irradiation, the damage morphologies of the filters depended greatly on the irradiation wavelength’s relative position to the passband, while in the case of free-running laser, there was no difference among the damage morphologies of different peak wavelength. According to experimental results and theoretical analysis, the laser induced damage mechanism of the filters has been given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".