MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354835911

Theory and Applicaton of Compressive Sensing

2010· article· en· W2354835911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jingwen Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed sensingOrthonormal basisComputer scienceNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremSIGNAL (programming language)Nyquist rateBasis (linear algebra)AlgorithmSampling (signal processing)Matrix (chemical analysis)Sample (material)Signal reconstructionMeasure (data warehouse)Process (computing)Mathematical optimizationSignal processingComputer visionMathematicsTelecommunicationsData miningPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional approaches to sampling signals follow Shannon principle. It take great costs on data storage. In this paper, the theory of Compressive sensing is introduced. Compressive sensing provides a new sampling theory to sample signal below the Nyquist rate. If signal or image is sparse in some orthonormal basis , signal or image can be recovered from small number of measurement using an optimization process .The structure of the signal is preserved in the measurement and the measure matrix is incoherent with the orthonormal basis. CS relies on two principles: sparsity and incoherence. RI Pprinciple is the precondiction of designing reconstruction algorithm. The application of CS theory are introduced and the simulation is illustrated in details.The simulation show that the signal can be reconstructed stablely when the number of samples is larger than K×log(N/K).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207