Comparison of microbial populations and foaming dynamics in conventional versus membrane enhanced biological phosphorous removal systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, molecular community analysis and analytical measurements were combined to assess and compare the identity, functionality, structure, and temporal changes of membrane and conventional enhanced biological phosphorous removal systems (which ran stable over 300 days) and to identify the dynamics of the foam forming population. Magnesium was added to the system with the goal to enhance phosphate removal. Both systems behaved similarly with respect to phosphate and nitrogen removal efficiency and had similar community evenness, but they differed in community composition. A principle component analysis indicated that, the community of the membrane system changed permanently whereas the conventional system returned to approximately its initial composition. The relative intensity of DGGE bands were transformed in a numerical matrix and based on this matrix a model was constructed, which predicted some bands as foam forming bands, which were identified as foam‐forming filamentous bacteria by sequencing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it