MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354905178

Operational Bridge Responses due to Road Surface Profile Spectral Excitations

2009· article· en· W2354905178 on OpenAlexaff
LI Wei-ming

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Civil,Architectural & Environmental Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectral densityBridge (graph theory)Road surfaceExcitationSurface (topology)Structural engineeringMathematical analysisMathematicsEngineeringGeometryStatisticsElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Random spectrum excitation samples of a road surface profile are investigated.The displacements,velocities,accelerations of a vehicle and a bridge structure are discussed using certain samples.The road excitations are numerically simulated by the random phase cosine method of the power spectral density.The vehicle bridge system responses are obtained using the vehicle bridge differential equations for different road surface profiles.It is concluded that the random phase has critical effects on the road surface profile curve shape,and the power spectral density on the curve value.The random samples possesses the same statistical characteristics.The system response values are affected more by the road surface profiles,and the response shapes are affected more as the vehicle velocity varies.Some engineering advice is proposed based on the numerical calculation with the different random excitation inputs for their significant differential responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Civil,Architectural & Environmental EngineeringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207