MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354987703

Research on Technology Statistical and Analysis between Chinese Men's Basketball Team with the Lithuania Team of the Last Two Olympic Games

2009· article· en· W2354987703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Deng-ying

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Xichang College · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasketballCompetition (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)AdvertisingPsychologyStatistical analysisPoint (geometry)Big gameMathematical statisticsApplied psychologyMarketingBusinessStatisticsHistoryGeographyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the literature material,observation records,mathematical statistics,comparative analysis to men's basketball quarter-final of the 28th,29th Olympic Games between the Chinese team and the Lithuania team competition technology statistics carries on the contrastive analysis.The result indicated:The Chinese team gets a little advantage in the number of free throws and the preceding performance rebound,and other each technical indicator there is a big gap with their rival,especially the 3-point shot percentage is extremely low which is the direct cause that the Chinesee team was stopped twice from entering four strong teams by the Lithuania team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Xichang CollegeSame topicSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207