MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355000121 · doi:10.2138/am-2002-0105

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic study of synthetic fluorapatite: Part I. Local structural environment and substitution mechanism of Gd <sup>3+</sup> at the Ca2 site

2002· article· en· W2355000121 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Chen, Yuanming Pan, John A. Weil

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron paramagnetic resonanceFluorapatiteChemistryParamagnetismCrystallographySpectral lineSingle crystalSpectroscopyDopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceMineralogyApatiteCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gd-doped fluorapatite (1.2 ± 0.2 wt% Gd2O3), synthesized from CaF2-rich melts, has been inves­tigated as single crystals and powder samples by using X-band (~9.4 GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy at -295 and 120 K. The well-resolved X-band EPR spectra yielded a previously unreported type of Gd3+ center "a" (S = 7/2) and also suggested the possible presence of a second and partly resolved type of Gd3+ center "b." In particular, the single-crystal X-band EPR spectra of center "a" from three orthogonal-rotation planes allowed determination of the spin-Hamil- tonian parameters, including the spin terms of type BS (matrix g) and S2 (matrix D) and the param­eters associated with the high-spin terms of type S4and S6 as well as BS3 and BS5. The validity of the parameters has been confirmed by agreement between observed and simulated EPR spectra for both single crystals and powder samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207