Study of cognitive impairments by using of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To examine cognitive impairment by using of Montreal cognitive assessment in patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIA).Methods:39 TIA patients were tested using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) during the first week after symptoms onset.Another 28 age,gender and education level matched health people were also recruited as a normal control group.Sores of neuropsychological scaling were compared between each of the two groups.Results:The summed sores of MoCA in patients with TIA were significantly lower than that of the normal control (24.46±2.51 vs.27.86± 1.76,P0.01).The cognitive impairment in TIA patients were prominently in spaces executive function (3.56±0.94 vs.4.61± 0.57,P0.01),memory (3.74 ±1.19 vs.4.43 ±0.74,p=0.005) and attention function (4.23 ±1.09 vs.5.43 ±0.57,P0.01) Conclusions:TIA patients have extent frontal and temporal lobe related cognition impairments and Montreal cognitive assessment can be used as an easy way to evaluate the cognition impairments in this patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".