MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355111489

Application of generalized Jensen-Schur measure in medical image registration

2009· article· en· W2355111489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaxima and minimaMutual informationImage registrationInterpolation (computer graphics)Measure (data warehouse)Convergence (economics)Noise (video)MathematicsComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmData miningMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the influences of noise,interpolation and image modality,the medical image registration method based on mutual information or normalized mutual information would cause local extrema,small convergence area,and even inaccurate registration.A new generalized Jensen-Schur measure was defined,which used nonlinear increasing of butterworth function to eliminate false extrema.Four new generalized Jensen-Schur measures,mutual information and normalized mutual information were analyzed and compared by applying them to rigid registration.The results of tests show that the new constructed JS22 and JS23 measures outperform other measures in noise immunity and convergence,and eliminating false extrema caused by PV interpolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it