MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355197634

Treatment of cotton pulp black liquor with ferrous-hydrogen peroxide method

2001· article· en· W2355197634 on OpenAlex
Peng Shu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hefei University of Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtenics and Innovation Methods
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack liquorHydrogen peroxidePulp (tooth)ChemistryFerrousPulp and paper industryPeroxideNuclear chemistryLigninOrganic chemistryEngineeringMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cotton pulp black liquor was first pretreated by the method of acid separation, then the treated liquor was catalyzed and oxidated with H 2O 2 Fe 2+ .The effects of some factors, such as dosages of H 2O 2 and Fe 2+ ,pH values, oxidation time and method for feeding H 2O 2,on the removal efficiency were discussed. The results showed the overall COD and colour removals were 94.1%and 88% respectively under appropriate conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it