The assessment of regional ecological risks of wind energy exploitation in the mountain area based on landscape ecology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess regional ecological risk of wind energy exploitation in the mountain area. Taking the landscape ecology as a point,considering the function and the anti-interference ability of different types of landscape in the ecological environment,isolation effect of wind energy exploitation on the regional landscape, meanwhile,combining with mountain surface,geological environment,regional landscape component,and the characteristic of wind energy exploitation,three indexes of landscape risk potential,isolation effect,ecological sensitive coefficient were put forward to design the evaluation model of regional ecological risks of wind energy exploitation in the mountain district. If the design was put into practice,73. 44% of the area will be intermediate risk and below area; less than 5% of the area will be high risk area or extremely high risk area,which is in the northeast of W1 and the south of W14-W22 section. Wind energy exploitation will increase regional ecological risk,and the risk change trend will appear obvious ridge orientation features; although the sphere of high risk influence is limited,the neighboring human activities esselte regions will be greatly effected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".