MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355255505

Nonlocal video denoising based on S_(1/2) matrix norm

2015· article· en· W2355255505 on OpenAlexaff
Zhang Jin-l

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optoelectronics·laser · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpulse noiseNoise reductionComputer scienceLow-rank approximationGaussian noiseVideo denoisingOutlierMatrix (chemical analysis)Artificial intelligenceMatrix normComputer visionGaussianAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsVideo processingVideo trackingPixel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to remove Gaussian noise and impulse noise from video data,a nonlocal video denoising algorithm based on S1/2 matrix norm is proposed.Firstly,using a diamond search algorithm for fast patch-matching,some patches similar to the given reference patch are found and collected in the video data.Secondly,all of the columns of similarity patches are recombined to form a new matrix and the new matrix is decomposed into a low rank matrix and a sparse matrix based on S1/2 matrix norm.The low rank matrix represents the scene information data of the original video and the sparse matrix represents the impulse noise data and outliers existing in the noisy video.Lastly,the estimated values of a denoised reference patch are determined by taking the weighted average of all the data recovered from the low rank matrix,and the estimated values of the denoised frame are got based on the combinations of all the recovered reference patches in a frame.Experimental results show that the proposed scheme can effectively remove Gaussian noise and impulse noise from the video.Compared with two existing state-of-art algorithms,the proposed algorithm has noticeable superiority in both visual effect and objective evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Optoelectronics·laserSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207