Effects of Bio-control Bacterium and Fulvic Acid on Cotton Growth and Verticillium Wilt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of endophytic bacterial strain 73a,antagonistic bacterial strain JB52 and fulvic acid on growth,yield and verticillium wilt of cotton were investigated through single and combine applications,respectively.Results showed that strains 73a and JB52 could promote growth of cotton seedlings and increase yield of seed cotton.Endophytic bacterial strain 73a was the best among all treatments.Height and fresh weight of individual cotton seedlings were increased up to 29.9% and 45.2% respectively by the application with strain 73a in pots.Yield of seed cotton was increased up to 11.5% and the control efficiency against verticillium wilt of cotton was up to 50% by the application with strain 73a in field.Fulvic acid had no efficiency on growth of cotton seedlings in pots or yield of cotton in field,but it could control verticillium wilt of cotton in field.The efficiency of single application with strain 73a was stronger than combine application with strain 73a and strain JB52 and combine application with strain 73a and fulvic acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".