MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355549267

On the Challenges of Foreign National Security Review Faced by China's State-owned Investment and the Countermeasures

2015· article· en· W2355549267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Ju

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaBusinessFinanceGovernment (linguistics)Investment (military)Corporate governanceNational securityState ownedEnterprise managementForeign direct investmentMarket economyEconomicsPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the beginning of the 21 century China has become a big emerging one of large overseas statedowned investment. But in China the system of modern enterprise governance is not sound. The reform of SOEs is still uncompleted. The strategic purposes of the stated-owned investments and the support to them are manifest. So China's stated-owned investments suffer special challenges. China's countermeasures are to reduce the statedowned investments, improve the system of modern enterprise governance, separate government functions from enterprise management, operate the SOEs on the commercial basis, abase the national strategic purposes of and the financial support to the oversea stated-owned investments. The countermeasures that shall be taken by China's investors are to summarize the experience and lessons of China's stated-owned investment's success and failure, to organize and operate the stated-owned investments according to the international standards, to dilute controlling rights, to give up or reduce the sensitive areas of business and to take other mitigation measures. So the security risks can be reduced or eliminated to pass the review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceFrench-language works237,207