MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355631813

Study on the International Competitiveness of China’s Industry of Textile Clothing: Based on Diamond Model and RCA Index

2009· article· en· W2355631813 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cheng Xi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiamond modelChinaClothingIndex (typography)Textile industryFactor endowmentRevealed comparative advantageClothing industryTextileBusinessPromotion (chess)Industrial organizationGlobalizationEndowmentInternational tradeCommerceCompetitive advantageComparative advantageEconomicsMarketingMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the background of economic globalization, enhancing the international competitiveness has become the core of industry development. Textile clothing is one of the predominant traditional industries in China, while it has endured more fierce pressure in recent years. Based on Professor Porter’s Diamond Model theory, this paper analyzes the present conditions and problems from four aspects: factor endowment, domestic demand, relevant industries and enterprises’ strategy, structures and competitiveness. Meanwhile, it compares the competitive capability of China, India, Italy and other countries by calculating the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index. In the end, four countermeasures and suggestions for the competitiveness promotion of China’s industry of textile clothing are accordingly proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207