Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective] Observation of Chinese medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients.[Method] Western medicine on the basis of conventional therapy,plus 5% glucose injection 250mL Canada Shenmai 30mL,5% glucose injection 250mL of Salvia miltiorrhiza 20mL,TMP injection 80mg,intravenous qd,Qi and blood circulation;and practices to the Ma Yan Wan 9g,qd,softening the stool through guided;if sweating,cold extremities,pulse slighdy stricken,yang who want to de - 40mL with intravenous Shenfu,qd,15 d to a course of treatment.2 months after treatment.Evaluation of the treatment effect. [Results] After 2 courses of treatment group 22 cases,effective in 4 cases,2 cases,total effective rate 92. 9%.One course of treatment with traditional Chinese medicine found no adverse reactions.[Conclusion] On the basis of western medicine in the combined treatment of myocardial infarction and other Shenmai Salvia Maren Pills effective,results were satisfactory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".