Bibliographic record
Abstract
A scientific agricultural (re)insurance pricing approach is essential for maintaining sustainable and viable risk management solutions for different stakeholders including farmers, governments, insurers, and reinsurers. The major objective of this thesis is to investigate high dimensional solutions to refine the agricultural insurance and reinsurance pricing. In doing so, this thesis develops and evaluates three high dimensional approaches for constructing actuarial ratemaking framework for agricultural insurance and reinsurance, including credibility approach, high dimensional copula approach, and multivariate weighted distribution approach. \n \n \nThis thesis comprehensively examines the ratemaking process, including reviews of different detrending methods and the generating process of the historical loss cost ratio's (LCR's, which is defined as the ratio of indemnities to liabilities). A modified credibility approach is developed based on the Erlang mixture distribution and the liability weighted LCR. In the empirical analysis, a comprehensive data set representing the entire crop insurance sector in Canada is used to show that the Erlang mixture distribution captures the tails of the data more accurately compared to conventional distributions. Further, the heterogeneous credibility premium based on the liability weighted LCR’s is more conservative, and provides a more scientific approach to enhance the reinsurance pricing. \n \n \nThe agriculture sector relies substantially on insurance and reinsurance as a mechanism to spread loss. Climate change may lead to an increase in the frequency and severity of spatially correlated weather events, which could lead to an increase in insurance costs, or even the unavailability of crop insurance in some situations. This could have a profound impact on crop output, prices, and ultimately the ability to feed the world rowing population into the future. This thesis proposes a new reinsurance pricing framework, including a new crop yield forecasting model that integrates weather and crop production information from different risk geographically related regions, and closed form reinsurance pricing formulas. The framework is empirically analyzed, with an original weather index system we set up, and algorithms that combine screening regression (SR), cross validation (CV) and principle component analysis (PCA) to achieve efficient dimension reduction and model selection. Empirical results show that the new forecasting model has improved both in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting abilities. Based on this framework, weather risk management strategies are provided for agricultural reinsurers. \n \n \nAdverse weather related risk is a main source of crop production loss, and in addition to farmers, this exposure is a major concern to insurers and reinsurers who act as weather risk underwriters. To date, weather hedging has had limited success, largely due to challenges regarding basis risk. Therefore, this thesis develops and compares different weather risk hedging strategies for agricultural insurers and reinsurers, through investigating the spatial dependence and aggregation level of systemic weather risks across a country. In order to reduce basis risk and improve the efficiency of weather hedging strategies, this thesis refines the weather variable modeling by proposing a flexible time series model that assumes a general hyperbolic (GH) family for the margins to capture the heavy-tail property of the data, together with the Lévy subordinated hierarchical Archimedean copula (LSHAC) model to overcome the challenge of high-dimensionality in modeling the dependence of weather risk. Wavelet analysis is employed to study the detailed characteristics within the data from both time and frequency scales. Results show that it is of great importance of capturing the appropriate dependence structure of weather risk. Further, the results reveal significant geographical aggregation benefits in weather risk hedging, which means that more effective hedging may be achieved as the spatial aggregation level increases. \n \n \nIt has been discussed that it is necessary to integrate auxiliary variables such as weather, soil, and other information into the ratemaking system to refine the pricing framework. In order to investigate a possible scientific way to reweight historical loss data with auxiliary variables, this thesis proposes a new premium principle based on multivariate weighted distribution. Some designable properties such as linearity and stochastic order preserving are derived for the new proposed multivariate weighted premium principle. Empirical analysis using a unique data set of the reinsurance experience in Manitoba from 2001 to 2011 compares different premium principles and shows that integrating auxiliary variables such as liability and economic factors into the pricing framework will redistribute premium rates by assigning higher loadings to more risky reinsurance contracts, and hence help reinsurers achieve more sustainable profits in the long term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".