Effect of Low Frequency Electromagnetic Therapy on Vascular Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of low frequency electromagnetic filed for vascular cognitive impairment.Methods: 121 patients with cerebral infarction of less 14 days were assigned to the control group(59 cases,nimodipine therapy) and study group(62 cases,nimodipine therapy+low frequency electromagnetic therapy).Both groups were assessed with mini-mental state examination(MMSE),activities of daily living scale(ADL) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale(MoCA) before and after treatment.Result: After treatment for average 20 days,MMSE,MoCA scales in study group were significantly higher than those before treatment(P0.01) and those in control group(P0.01).All items of MoCA were significantly improved as compared with those before treatment except naming and abstract thinking(P0.01);ADL scales in study group were significantly lower than those before treatment(P0.01) and those in control group(P0.05).Conclusion: Low frequency electromagnetic therapy in combination with medication could obviously improve the cognitive level of vascular cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".