A Comparative Study on High Molecular Weight Glutenin-subunit for Seeds of Some Common Wheat CMS Lines and Their Maintainers and Restorers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to clarify the differences of seeds of high molecular weight glutenin-subunit(HMW-GS) among different cytoplasmic male sterile lines with the same nuclear and among A-lines,B-lines and R-lines,HMW-GS in seeds of T-,Q-,Al-type male-sterile lines with same nuclear and their B-lines,and R-lines etc totally 42 wheat germplasm lines were studied by means of SDS-PAGE.The results showed that glutenin subunit composition of B-line Mianyang 92-8 were similar to its three male-sterile lines(TA 92-8,QA 92-8,AL 92-8) at loci of Glu-A 1 and Glu-B 1,but different from each other at locus of Glu-D 1.T,Q,AL-type sterile cytoplasm had certain difference each other,that is to say,differences between the A-lines and B-lines with the same karyon depend on action between karyon and cytoplasm each other.The R-line and the B-line had certain differences of glutenin subunit from each other.R-lines had largely no bands at the Glu-A 1 locus,the high frequencies of the bands 6 and 8 and the low frequencies of the 7-band at the Glu-B 1 locus,and B-lines had largely the band 2*,the low frequencies of the bands 6 and 8 and the high frequencies of the band 7 at the Glu-B 1 locus.In addition,B-lines had more high quality subunit across than R-lines,we should strengthen quality breeding in the subsequent improvement of varieties.The study provided to an identification method for T-,Q-,Al-type male-sterile lines wheat with same nuclear and certain referrence about cytoplasmic male sterility genetic and physiological mechanisms of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".