Unrestricted Wideband Prediction for Antenna Radiation Efficiency Using Wheeler Caps
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The radiation efficiency prediction using the Wheeler cap is introduced using a semianalytic approach based on the adaptive fitting quality factor method. The procedure details, highlighting the benefits of using the proposed method, are presented, especially in the presence of cavity modes. Also, a procedure is proposed to eliminate the effect of cavity modes for low-frequency antenna measurements. Several studies over the suitability of the proposed procedure are presented to justify the usage of the quality-factor-based method beyond its previous limited usages. The reproduction of results is ensured by considering sufficient data based on an asymptotic prediction of the cavity modes' frequency spacing. Moreover, full-wave simulation results are presented to verify the proposed method and its immunity to the effects of arbitrary Wheeler caps' cavity modes in a controlled environment, anticipating possible sources of errors. Also, the same simulated responses are used through other circuit model-independent radiation efficiency prediction procedures to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Furthermore, the measurement results are presented for various antennas to verify the proposed method in comparison with the full-wave analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it