MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356468393

Studies on resource management problem of Sanjiang plain groundwater

2006· article· en· W2356468393 on OpenAlex
Dan Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeoscience and Mining Technology
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterConstraint (computer-aided design)Sanjiang PlainDifferential equationWater resourcesEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Computer scienceSoil scienceApplied mathematicsMathematicsGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMathematical analysisEcologyWetland
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article establishes ground water flows differential equation mathematical model of Sanjiang plain in the hydrology theory foundation,and uses the analysis finite element method to liner change the differential equation into the large-scale system of linear equations.It tooks linear equations as a part of constraint conditions of the optimized model,carries on the ground water flow status equation and the optimized model the coupling,and carries on the solution with the Lingo software.The result indicated that this local shallow layer ground water resources are rich and have the big development potential.But recent years water resources disposition was unreasonable and ground water mining quantity was oversized,these caused the region water flux to assume the drop tendency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it