MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356490285

Study on Relationship Between Stem Characters and Output in Early Janopica Rice of Cold Region

2010· article· en· W2356490285 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenfu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanicleYield (engineering)Biomass (ecology)HorticultureBiologyDry weightAgronomyMaterials scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

180 early janopica rice varieties(or lines) were studied in special ecological environment of cold region.The relations of the stem characters and output were discussed systematically.The main results were as follows:In a restricted range,controlling length of 3 rd internode from the top,increasing length of 1 st and 2 nd internode from the top could raise yield and benefit for choosing length of 1 st and 3 rd internode from the top.In configuring internode thickness,increasing based internode thickness based on ensuring the thickness of 1 st internode from the top was beneficial to high-yielding.Adding dry weight of basal internode(DWBI),dry weight of pedicle sheath(DWPS),dry weight of per plant was in favor of high-yielding.Raising biomass by appropriately increasing plant height and pole length might be the direction of super-high rice breeding in the future.DWBI,thickness of 2 nd internode from the top,DWPS and length of panicle neck were enough to stand for the whole amount of information about twelve stem characters when making comprehensive evaluation on stem characters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalmedium
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicAgriculture, Soil, Plant ScienceFrench-language works237,207