MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356539227

Study of Roadpacker Solidified Limestone Soil Application Technology

2009· article· en· W2356539227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
LU Ying-l

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction & Design for Project · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubbaseCation-exchange capacitySoil typeEnvironmental scienceSoil waterGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roadpacker plus is a type of liquid cation-exchanger made from Canada. The electric double layer of the soil surface can be destroyed by the intense ion. Therefore, the soil surface's properties are changed fundamentally, and the soil changes to hydrophobic. Under the pressure, the soil's strength begins to format and the soil has the good water resisting property. So the Roadpacker plus can accelerate the stabilization and strength of soil. As an environment protection new material, the Roadpacker solidified limestone soil can be used as the subbase of superhighway or first class highway, and can be used as the base course of second-class road or lower grade road, specially of the country road. The research offers the design standards of the Roadpacker solidified limestone soil (different types of soil) , the proper ratio of mixture coverage, and the proper way of health preserving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstruction & Design for ProjectSame topicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207