MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356802439

Application of Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Screening MCI in Community Elderly in Chengdu

2011· article· en· W2356802439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo linchuang xinlixue zazhi · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCronbach's alphaCutoffPsychologyYouden's J statisticGerontologyCognitive impairmentElderly peopleIndex (typography)CognitionMedicineReceiver operating characteristicClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryPsychometrics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To analyse the screening effect of MoCA for MCI,and discuss the best cutoff value,to assist in early detection of MCI patients in old people.Methods: MCI was screened in community elderly in Chengdu by MMSE and MoCA.Results: The total number of subjects was 674,the number of MCI was 106.The Cronbach's index was 0.852;the correlation coefficient between the MoCA and MMSE was 0.9392;the sensitivity and specificity of MoCA was 98.11% and 26.72%,and Youden's index was 0.2483.Conclusion: The MoCA is a feasible screening tool for MCI;22 points is recommended instead of 26 as the boundary value in community elderly in Chengdu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it