MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357033030

Research on the Set up of Undergraduate Curriculum for English Majors of Application-oriented Institutions with Local Characteristics: Taking Business English as an Example

2015· article· en· W2357033030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueValue Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsLa Cité Collégiale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecialtyCurriculumCohesion (chemistry)Vocational educationOrder (exchange)Business EnglishMathematics educationSet (abstract data type)PedagogyPolitical scienceMedical educationSociologyEngineeringPsychologyComputer scienceBusinessMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to complete the cohesion and the transition of higher vocational college English specialty to the applied undergraduate English specialty, this article adopted the methods of questionnaire investigation and theoretical analysis, and discussed the positioning and development direction of the curriculum of applied undergraduate English specialty, and tentatively put forward some professional skills curriculum advice suitable for the newly promoted colleges with local characteristics, in order to help them successfully complete the transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it