MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357133205

Solids Concentration in the Fully Developed Zone of CFB Downers

2007· article· en· W2357133205 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluidized bed combustionMaterials scienceWork (physics)FluidizationSolid fuelParticle (ecology)Solid solutionFluid catalytic crackingMechanicsFluidized bedCrackingThermodynamicsChemistryComposite materialMetallurgyCombustionPhysicsGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to investigate the solid concentrations in the fully developed region of the circulating fluidized bed(CFB)downers,the actual solid concentration was measured by an optical solid concentration probe in a 9.5 m high downer with fluid catalytic cracking(FCC)particles.Based on the experimental data from this work and in the literature,the influences of operating conditions,particle diameter and downer diameter on the solid concentration in the fully developed zone of CFB downers were studied.The results show that,for a given superficial gas velocity,the solid concentration linearly increases with the solid circulation rate,and the effect of particle diameter on the solid concentration in the fully developed zone of the CFB downers reduces with increasing superficial gas velocity.The results also show that the solid concentration in fully developed zone of CFB downers changes little with the downer diameter.Based on these facts,an empirical correlation used to predict the solid concentration in the fully developed zone of CFB downers was proposed.The comparison of the experimental data with the predicted values confirms the validity of the proposed correlation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese UniversitiesSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207