MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357166034

Effect of Nickel on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Ulmus pumila L.

2015· article· en· W2357166034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miao Xiulia

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicleSeedlingGerminationHypocotylElongationBiologyHorticultureBotanyAgronomyMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ecological effect of nickel on seed germination and seedling growth of Ulmus pumila L was studied in this paper.The results showed that:the treatment with 1mg/L Ni 2+can enhance the seed vigor.The high concentration of(5,10mg/L)had significant inhibition on the growth of radicles.When Ni 2+concentration were higher than 50 mg/L,the seeds germination and growth were all damaged,leading to low seedling survival rate even unable to germinate.This suggested that low concentration of Ni 2+can promote seed germination and seedling growth,while exceeding certain density range can inhibit it.The range of inhibition of germination rate was near 10mg/L,radicle elongation inhibition threshold was in the 0-5mg/L range,hypocotyl elongation threshold was in the 5-50mg/L range.When soil was fertilized,nickel concentrations should not exceed 5mg/kg Ulmus pumila L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207