MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357169162

WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES WITH MODE COMPENSATION IN FREQUENCY DOMAIN

2002· article· en· W2357169162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalFrequency domainNatural frequencyMode (computer interface)Normal modeModal analysisFrequency responseRange (aeronautics)Lattice (music)Structural engineeringPhysicsAcousticsComputer scienceEngineeringVibrationMathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large span spatial lattice structures are characterized by the existence of many natural frequencies in a narrow frequency range. Consequently, with the modal analysis method, it is difficult to contain all significant contribution modes. It has been shown that some high order modes, which contribute to wind response significantly, are likely to be overlooked because of their higher modal order. From a view point of contributions of modes to the strain energy of the system, it is suggested to make an efficient selection of dominant modes in this paper. A simple and effective method to compensate the errors owing to leaving out some high order modes is proposed. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through a numerical simulation of the wind response of a spherical dome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207