Study on quasi-two-dimensional submerged vertical over-expanded supersonic jets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quasi-two-dimentional submerged vertical over-expanded supersonic jets were studied experimentally and numerically.The gas-jet flow patterns under over-expanded conditions were recorded at real time by a high-speed camera at the rate of 1000 frames/s.The development process of supersonic gas jets and the process of the instable flow pattern were visualized clearly.The pure gas flow field inside and outside the Laval nozzle used in the experiment was numerically simulated by FLUENT,and results dedicate a complex shock wave region existing out of the nozzle exit.The simulation results are instrumental in understanding the unstable pattern of submerged vertical supersonic jet flow as an aided reference.The experimental and simulation results indicate that,the frequency of back-attack will be reduced at the operating conditions of relatively small mass flow and a high Mach-number,and this is proved by the discovery of quasi-back-attack phenomenon.The finding in the paper provides an available theroretical reference for weakening or eliminating the cavitation erosion in engineering application field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".