MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357267583

Study on Vitality Index Changes of Kenaf Seed in Aging Process

2009· article· en· W2357267583 on OpenAlex
Yan Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicHibiscus Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationSeedlingKenafVitalityAccelerated agingHorticultureHumidityDry weightRelative humidityIndex (typography)AgronomyBiologyMaterials scienceComposite materialFiberGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study the vitality index including germination potential,germination percentage,germination index,vigor index,simple vigor index and seedling dry weight of 15 kenaf seeds by way of artificial acceferated aging.The result showed that the germination percentage,germination index and vigor index of these seeds reducing gradually with treat time on condition that high temperature(44±1)℃ and high humidity crelative humidity 95 percent),but the change was different mong different varieties.Through the vague mathematics subjected function synthesical evalucation,The resistomce of aging of the 15 varieties kenaf seeds in sequence from strong to weak as follows:Liao 55C-2Yuehong 1#SD 124Xinhong 95Taihong 763KB 11Qingpi 183-20SF 192V 379Hongyin 135KB 2Fonghong 991Tainong 1.and the germination potential,germination percentage,germination index,vigor index,simple vigor index and seedling dry weight were negatively correlated with the extent of artificial aging treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it