Determination and Change During Storage of Azoxystrobin Residue Levels in Muskmelon and Apple after a Dip Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the indication of the effectiveness, residue uptake, and persistence of when stored at room tempera- ture or at 0℃～4℃ in the management of postharvest decay in apple and melon. The residue levels in apple and muskmelon treated with azoxystrobin were studied by extraction with ethyl acetate/cyclohexane and determination by gas chromatography (GC) with nitrogen/ phosphorous (NP-) detection. The recoveries were in the range of 85% ～104% from fortified samples, and the limit of detection (LODs) was 0.001mg/kg. The residue levels in both fruit was below 0.1mg/kg, which was much lower than the tolerance level fixed for tomato (0.2mg/kg) in the United States and for peaches (0.8mg/kg) in Canada. The residue levels showed less during storage at low temperature. The residue levels reduced slowly along with the storage time. In peel the residue levels were higher than that in pulp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".