MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357541365

Establishment of Proteomic Analysis of Suspension Cells in Betula platyphylla Suk.

2014· article· en· W2357541365 on OpenAlexaff
Le Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueAnhui nongye kexue · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyProteomicsTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresisMass spectrometryProtein precipitationGel electrophoresisChemistryPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisProteomeMolecular biologyBiochemistryBiologyEnzyme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective] To establish a two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis( 2-D PAGE) system for suspension cell proteomic analysis of Betula platyphylla. [Method]the improved acetic acid( TCA)-acetone precipitation method was applied for suspension cell protein isolation and purification,and the key technologies of electrophoresis including the sample loading quantity and types of IPG strip were optimized. [Reault]The results indicated that the reproducible 2-D gel with more spots and high resolution electrophoresis diagram could be obtained by using the improved TCA-acetone precipitation method,with 9. 0 μg / μl of loading protein sample on 17 cm IPG strip with p H 4-7. About 1 000 protein spots were obtained by PDQuest software analysis. 3 randomly selected protein spots were used to identify by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry( MALDI TOF MS). The identified 3 proteins were S-S-adenosylmethionine synthetase,transposase for IS1330 and transcriptional regulatory proteins of PadR family,respectively. [Conclusion] The study laid the foundation for using proteomics analysis inducer to improve secondary metabolites accumulation mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnhui nongye kexueSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207