MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357556930

Correlation analysis between chemical components and sensory quality of coffee

2013· article· en· W2357556930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology of Food Industry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoffee research and impacts
Canadian institutionsLa Cité Collégiale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrigonellineCaffeineChlorogenic acidFood scienceRoastingSugarChemistrySensory analysisSensory systemCorrelation coefficientMathematicsBiologyStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the relationship between chemical composition and sensory quality of coffee,the content of protein,reducing sugar,chlorogenic acid,trigonelline,caffeine and pH value of coffee bean from seven different producing areas were tested and analyzed.The results of Pearson Linear Correlation Test showed that,the content of caffeine and trigonelline and sensory score was negatively related,with the correlation coefficient of 0.855 and 0.366,and the difference was significant.High sensory score was positively correlated to the loss amount of caffeine(r =0.897),trigonelline(r =0.848),chlorogenic acid(r =0.933) and reducing sugar(r=0.713) with a significant difference.However,as for the loss amount of protein,the linear dependence was not remarkable.Besides,an improvement of pH value was observed after roasting.The pH value of coffee from different roasting degrees and origins were similar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it