Effects of Genotype and Hormones on the Regeneration of Transgenic Potato Plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The factors affecting plant regeneration of transgenic potato,genotype and hormones,were analyzed in this study.The results showed that potato genotypes affected callus and adventitious bud formation.The frequencies of callus of five varieties varied from 72.22% to 95.83% and the most efficient varieties was Russet Burbank;the frequencies of adventitious bud formation was 0-11.54% and the best responded genotype was Favorita.The combination of 6-BA and NAA evidently influenced the formation of Russet Burbank callus and adventitious bud;The induction frequency of callus was highest in the medium with 2.5 mg/L 6-BA and 0.2-0.3 mg/L NAA;The best frequency of adventitious buds formation was obtained in the medium with 2.5 mg/L 6-BA and 0.1 mg/L NAA.The concentration of NAA influenced callus formation from leaf discs with post-effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".