MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W235771049

CANADA : LES MUTATIONS D'UNE POPULATION CROISSANTE [Canada: Mutations of a growing population]

2013· article· en· W235771049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gérard-François Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationGeographyDiversification (marketing strategy)PopulationPolitical scienceEthnologyEconomyHumanitiesDemographySociologyEconomicsArchaeologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French Abstract: La population du Canada s’accroit de facon constante au fil des differents recen-sements quinquennaux de ce pays. Cette croissance demographique est portee par une immigration en pleine mutation compte tenu de la diversification des pays d’origine. La geographie du peuplement du Canada se transforme, tandis que les langues maternelles se diversifient. Une autre mutation tient a l’effet de ciseau in-tervenu dans l’armature urbaine, Toronto ayant depasse et largement supplante Montreal au premier rang des metropoles canadiennes.English Abstract: Canada's population is growing steadily over different quinquennial censuses of this country. This population growth is driven by immigration changing due to the diversification of countries of origin. The settlement geography of Canada is changing, while the native languages diversify. Another mutation is due to the squeeze intervened in the urban framework, Toronto had surpassed Montreal and largely supplanted the leading Canadian cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207