MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357730943

Exploration on Water Supply & Drainage Planning and Study Under Perspective of Rural and Urban Areas——for an example of Xianyang city

2011· article· en· W2357730943 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGround Water · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrainageWater supplyWater resource managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the basis of empirical research on development and utilization of water resources at home and abroad,the present situation of water supply and drainage status are analyzed,and then problems of water supply and drainage such as the aging water supply pipes,over-exploited underground water,low sewage treatment efficiency in urban and rural area are put forward.The water demand is forecasted to guide urban and rural configuration of water supply and drainage,then the emphasis of water supply and drainage is confirmed.At last,the countermeasures and suggestions that the town should fully play the impetus function,the laws and systems should be improved and poly-pattern financing channel should be constructed are put forward for Xianyang City.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it