MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358039992

Brief Introduction for Coiled Tubing(CT) Standard at Home and Abroad

2015· article· en· W2358039992 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
FU Hong-qian

Bibliographic record

VenueWelded Pipe and Tube · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpec#EngineeringComputer scienceProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, it briefly introduced the current standards of CT manufacture and use at home and abroad, including API RP 5C7:1996,API SPEC 5LCP:2006,API SPEC 5ST:2010,API RP 16ST:2009, API RP 5C8 draft, Coiled Tubing Operations—An Industry Recommended Practice(IRP) for the Canadian Oil and Gas Industry Volume 21—2010, as well as China's some standards, such as SY/T 6698, SY/T 6700—2014, SY/T 6895—2012, Q/SY 1082—2010 and Q/SY 1512—2012 etc. The background, main content and the problems occurred in the use procedure of API RP 5C7,API SPEC 5LCP and API SPEC 5ST were detailedly introduced. By studying CT standards at home and abroad, wishes it can provide help for scientific research, production and the related standard user of domestic coiled tubing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWelded Pipe and TubeSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207