Moleculer Identification of Aechrmea and Relative Genera in Bromeliaceae. by ISSR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
12 Inter Simple Sequence Repeat(ISSR)primers were used to detect genetic variation among 4 genera,including 14 individuals of Bromeliaceae.Percentage of polymorphic bands(PPB)among different species was evident high about 97%.According to deodrogram,14 species were divided into four provenance areas,among which Aechmea rubroliifolia,Aechmea bracteata,Aechmea chlorophylla and Aechmea fendleri are morphological;meanwhile Aechmea ramosa var.festiva,Aechmea fasciata and Aechmea tessmanii are monophyletic.These results show that Aechmea exhibits high genetic diversity and complexity.According to the relationship between subgenera of Aechmea and relative genera,Aechmea subgenera had high relationship with Hobenbergia lanata and subgenera of Macrochordion(Aechmea chlorophylla)withCanistropsis burchellii.Detail information and illustration about origin for Aechmea and standard taxa for Bromeliaceae were discussed in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".