Clinical study on vascular cognitive impairment after infarction of basal ganglia-capsula interna area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the characteristics of vascular cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction in basal ganglia-capsula interna area. Methods Forty-two patients with basal ganglia-capsula interna area infarction three months after onset (case group) who admitted between January 2011 and September 2012,and 35 healthy subjects (control group) were enrolled in present study. The cognitive functions in all participants were evaluated by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) . Results The scores of MoCA in case group were significantly lower than that in control group (18.98±4.36 vs 23.17 ±2.26,P0.01) . Of 42 cases in case group,25 (59.5% ) had a MoCA score less than 23. Compared with control group,the scores of view space and executive capability (2.90 ±1.28 vs 3. 69±0. 83,P0. 01) ,attention (3.45±1.37 vs 4.80±1.08,P0.01) and abstract thinking capability (0.76±0.69 vs1.31 ±0.63,P0.01 ) in case group significantly lowered. Conclusions Vascular cognitive function impairment is common in patients with basal ganglia-capsula interna area infarction,and the dysfunctions of view space and executive capability,attention and abstract thinking capability are its main manifestation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".