Bibliographic record
Abstract
The floral biology of Camellia rosthorniana was investigated for the first time,and the influences of different sunlight to flowering were characterized.The results showed that flower bud differentiation lasted for 9 to 10 months,including in green-bud stage,red-bud stage,coloring stage,unfold-petal stage and flowering stage.The large amount flower buds distributed on the top and axils of the annual shoots.The flower number/cm shoot was 1.32 to 1.77,and the flower period/tree was 15 d to 20 days,as well as every flower lasted 4 days to 5 days.Flower bud differentiation had been influened significantly by various sunlight.Flower bud could be differentiated naturally under full-sunlight or canopy density 0.4.When canopy density was up to 0.7,the number of flower buds decreased greatly.In conclusion,C.rosthorniana was an excellent multiflora and flavor species,and suitable for landscaping under full-or semi-sunlight,or pot indoors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".