MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358450874

Study on Eliminating Physiological Dormancy and Germination of Pittosporum tobira (Pittosporaceae) Seeds.

2011· article· en· W2358450874 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liu Jian-ping

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed Germination and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationStratification (seeds)DormancyOrnamental plantSeed dormancyBiologyHorticultureBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dormancy and germination of ornamental Pittosporum tobira seeds were adequately investigated in this study.The embryos of almost fresh seeds(98%) were dyed red,but only a small part of fresh seeds could germinate at range of constant temperatures(10,15,20,25℃and 30℃) and altering temperature(25/15℃).Two GA3 solutions(e.g.,100mM and 200mM) slightly promoted fresh seeds to germinate,the highest germination rate was 41% at 25/15℃ with 200mM.After cold stratification at 5℃ for 90d,the germination was significantly enhanced to 84% and 95% after 60d and 90d at 25℃ and 25/15℃,respectively.Interestingly,seeds germination percentages would increased to 69% and 94% at 25/15℃,which were stratified for 30d and 40d in light,respectively.The results indicated that seeds of this specie with non-deep physiological dormancy,which could be broken by cold stratification,but the treatments with only GA3 solutions didn't break dormancy,the treatments by 200mM of GA3 solution combined with cold stratification for some days(e.g.,30d or 40d) also significantly facilitated the germination.Also,temperature directly affected the germination of non-dormant seeds.Among a few temperatures,the altering tepmperature treatment of 25/15℃ was optimum for its germination in light,which the final germination percentage was more than 90%,followed by that of 25℃.This study indicated that the physiological dormant mechanism might block the germination in natural environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicSeed Germination and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207