MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358606802

Application of Bacterial Foraging Optimization in Non-linear Model Identification

2009· article· en· W2358606802 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji fangzhen · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationRobustness (evolution)Identification (biology)ForagingConvergence (economics)Computer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Mathematical optimizationSystem identificationSwarm intelligenceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsData miningBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new identification algorithm of the non-linear system was proposed based on bacterial foraging optimization(BFO).In swarms intelligence, the biomimicry of BFO algorithm was used to identify a Hammerstein model and its parameters.The validity and the influence of BFO algorithm's selection of parameters and identification results by the experiment are showed.BFO identification algorithm was compared with particle swarm optimization(PSO) algorithm, and its robustness of colored noise, the identification precision of the model, the convergence of parameters and so on were analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it