MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358613815

A study on correlation between alexithymia and occupational stress in nurses

2014· article· en· W2358613815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
WU Ai-fe

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Nursing Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScaleOccupational stressClinical psychologyCorrelationMedicineScale (ratio)Positive correlationPsychologyNursingInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To explore the correlation between alexithymia and occupational stress in nurses. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on 255 nurses.The general information questionnaire, Toronto alexithymia scale and the nurse occupation stress questionnaire were used to collect dada. Results:①The total scores of alexithymia and nurse occupational stress were 52.35±8.24 and 26.32±4.63 respectly. ② Pearson correlation showed that the score of each dimension of alexithymia was positively correlated with the score of each dimension of nurse occupational stress(P0.05). ③Hierarchical regression analysis revealed affective disorder of recognition, affective disorder of description and extroverted thinking were contributing factors of nurse occupational stress. Conclusion: Nursing administrators could reduce nurse occupational stress by improving alexithymia level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Nursing ManagementSame topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207