MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358689523

Analysis of Trupak and Bakholdin Formulas for Temperature Field of Single-Row-Pipe Frozen Soil Wall

2008· article· en· W2358689523 on OpenAlex
Yu Feng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tongji University · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsPCL Construction (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerge (version control)Finite element methodGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsStructural engineeringGeologyEngineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comparative study of the temperature field calculated by the Trupak(Трупак)and Bakholdin(Бахолдин)formulas with that simulated by FEM software shows the shortcomings of the Trupak formulas for frozen soil wall of single-row pipes.Discussion on the applicability of the calcu-lating method for frozen wall thickness by the Trupak and the Bakholdin formulas based on the temperature measured indicates that the Trupak formulas are accurate before the frozen soil columns merge,whereas the Bakholdin formulas are suitable after the frozen soil columns merge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it