Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin type A(BTX-A) for trigeminal neuralgia.Methods: Forty-seven cases of trigeminal neuralgia were randomly divided into two groups,receiving Carbamazeping tabs(control group,A),and subcutaneous injection of BTX-A(therapy group,B),respectively.The onset of trigeminal neuralgia,severity of trigeminal neuralgia,as well as side effects in patients with trigeminal neuralgia were recorded by the use of questionnaire,and compared before and 6 months after treatment.Results: The short form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Quality of Life Scale scores were significantly different before and 1,3 and 6 months after treatment in both two groups.There was significant difference in the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Quality of Life Scale scores between groups A and B 1,3 and 6 months after treatment(P0.05).Conclusion: BTX-A has therapeutic effects on trigeminal neuralgia with few side effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".