MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358902805

Resource-based cities' development path and evolution mechanism in Northeast China——an man-land relationship perspective

2014· article· en· W2358902805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northeast Normal University · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndowmentChinaConnotationResource (disambiguation)DilemmaEconomic geographyGeographyPerspective (graphical)Political scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resource-based cities'problems are the focus and dilemma of city problems all around the world.The resource-based cities have profound connotation of man-land relationships.Based on the study of the spatial-temporal characteristics of man-land relationship evolution of resource-based cities in Northeast China,the essay concludes that:the man-land relationship evolution of resource-based cities in Northeast China have experienced four main stages,and become mitigating;industrial structures,urban functions,and spatial distribution show spatial differentiation characteristics significantly.The spatial-temporal differentiation of man-land relationship evolution of resource-based cities in Northeast China is affected by the comprehensive functions of historical bases,technological and institutional changes,spatial location,and differences of resources endowment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it